Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Piltdown Hoax

The Piltdown Hoax is about the finding made by Charles Dawson in England, 1912. He declared to have found the remainders of an ancient human ancestor in the pit of Piltdown. This founding was quick to call the attention of the scientific community since during this time fossils were not known to be found in England. Instead they were more common to be found in Asia, France and Germany. His was what look like a piece of a skull, later on Dawson found the what turned to be the remains of a female ape jaw bone, what was strange of this fossil was that the ape possessed human teeth, something was never seeing before. This fossils were essential to make the connection between ancient human and apes, the scientific community thought it could be the missing link. During this time there was no questioning or doubting Dawson founds, he was trusted that he was been honest, but it wasn’t until 1950 that he's founding started to be questionable and with the new technology and methods created, the hoax was investigated. A British Museum  used the technique of Fluorine Analysis to demonstrate that piece of skull they had found was older than the jaw. The skull was probably around 100 years older. Creating a more deep investigation to the rest of the fossils. This investigation ended with the discovery that perhaps Dawson had dig the fossils there himself or someone else had done it. With the new advancement in technology many theories and many people have being put into doubt. Dawson is an example of it. When had just discovered the fossils his word was taken with no questioning, to just two 20 years later be questionable. Science is the fact, theory, always based on proof. But at the end is the facts that humans themselves can present. Because of this I think it’s hardly doable to remove human factor from science. What I learned from this, was that sometimes you can’t trust people until their proof has been verified. 

2 comments:

  1. Hi Gaby. Interesting post. I think that you got your information a bit mixed up. The hoax was discovered in 1953. The skull turned out to only be 600 years old, as opposed to the 500,000-1 mill years it was initially thought to be. Overall, you seem to cover most of the information that was asked of us, I just think that it was all a bit unorganized, you jump from one thing to another, transitions weren't very clear. Overall not bad, keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good synopsis except for your use of the term "missing link". Did you review the background information on this term to understand the problems with this term?

    If the significance of the find is NOT that it was the missing link, what was the significance of Piltdown? Had it been valid, what would it have taught us about how humans evolved?

    I can't find your section addressing the issue of human faults. It would help if you broke your post up into paragraphs, just like any other academic paper, to make it clearer where you are discussing required points of the assignment.

    Good descriptions of the technologies used to uncover the hoax earlier in your post. Other than better technology, what about the scientific method itself helped to uncover the hoax? Why were scientists still investigating this find some 40 years after it was uncovered?

    "But at the end is the facts that humans themselves can present."

    I'm not sure I understand what you are arguing here. How does this explain why you can't remove the human factor from the process of science?

    Okay on your life lesson, but don't be afraid to expand and fully explain your answers.

    ReplyDelete